Wah?

Nov. 24th, 2014 08:38 pm
potentiality_26: (castle)
Behind on most of my shows, among other things, and I'm plodding forward.  Just saw the Castle episode "The Time of Our Lives."  WTF?  I mean, it was a cute episode and the ending was a) lovely and b) a long time in coming, good job finally getting it together, show.  But seriously, what was this plot?  I mean, I'm an SF buff, I can suspend my disbelief through a departure from the possible, but only if that has been telegraphed to me by the plot of the program in advance.

You cannot go 7 seasons having everything be essentially real-world logic with occaisional departures into silliness and a handful of plotlines which could be explained by supernatural means or natural ones depending on how you want to take it, and then be like "Oh hey, alternate universe episode kids.  Bye."

I just don't get it.
  
potentiality_26: (castle)
It's a bit late, as usual, but I only saw the finale recently.  It was cute and there was Pete and I don't have a whole lot else to say, but-
Like a lot of people, I'm annoyed about the ending.  It's seems rather cheap.  I mean, who's watching Castle at this point and thinking, I like this show and all, but I won't come back unless there's a cliffhanger?  See, if a show is going to have a big storyline that it takes them more than one episode to tell- more than a season to tell, even- I don't mind when there's a break in the middle and it happens to coincide with the finale (Longmire is a good example of doing this well).  Cliffhangers don't bother me in the "OMG but what happens next?!?" sense.  They bother me in the "I have fabricated something unexpected and cruel in order to upset you for several months, just because I can," sense.  This was pretty bad in that regard.  I know it probably connects back to the business with Bracken somehow, but it was also completely and totally unnecessary.


That said, I enjoyed this last season, and I've heard that it had some of the series' best ratings ever.  Hopefully that will tell other show runners that answering the endless will they or won't they question does not mean death for their shows.  Which would be good, because will they or won't they bores the hell out of me.

Also )                                                      
  
potentiality_26: (castle)
Also from [livejournal.com profile] ladygj, Castle

Favorite characters: Castle, Beckett, Ryan, Esposito, Alexis, Martha
OTP(s): Esposito/Ryan, Beckett/Castle
Funniest character: Castle
Prettiest character: Lanie
Most badass character: I can't really decide between Beckett and Esposito here; they're both badass, if in slightly different ways
Most annoying character: Gates?  I don't dislike her, especially now, I just didn't like how she was portrayed during the first season she was introduced.  She was the butt of too many jokes in comparison to the other characters.  That seems to have calmed down lately, though.
My favorite thing that has happened so far: Beckett and Castle getting together.  I wasn't hugely invested in their romance, and it would have been fine with me if they stayed just friends, but I really hate long, drawn out, "will they or won't they" set-ups.  TV shows have got it into their heads that- as Joss Whedon once said- happy relationships are boring.  I love this show for taking the leap and actually letting them be together.  I'm a lot more interested in what comes next for them now than I was a few years ago.
What I would most like to see happen next: I'm not really sure; I think this show is really cool when it does a sustained plot-line, and more to that effect would be nice.
 
potentiality_26: (castle)
Spoiler levels will vary, since in some cases I'm still not quite current, but just to be safe.

Agents of Shield )

Castle )

Pacific Rim )

Thor: the Dark World )
 
potentiality_26: (castle)

To rail against the whole Beckett going to Washington plotline.

Now, obviously I haven’t seen any of S6 and I’ve avoided spoilers so I have no idea where they’re going with it, but what I saw in S5 really pissed me off.

To be clear, I have no problem with the idea of Beckett wanting more than to be a cop. She wants to be a secret agent or whatever we’re calling these people, more power to her. I don’t even mind the whole moving to Washington idea. If I actually believed for a second that they were going to change the landscape of the show dramatically and either send Beckett and Castle to Washington or send just Beckett to Washington and show Castle negotiating a long-distance relationship and also working with a new detective, I would sort of love it. I like shows that aren’t afraid to break the status quo. Of the major regulars on Stargate: SG-1, only two had their spots as regulars in all ten seasons. On Angel, they sent the characters in S5 to work for the firm that was a major bad villain in all the previous ones. Change is good if it’s done right.

To repeat, Beckett being ambitious is not a problem for me. She is a smart, tough, capable woman and if she wanted to be President all of a sudden, that would be fine with me. The problem is that ‘all of a sudden’ is exactly what this is. Wanting more than to be a cop has never been part of Beckett’s character. I mean, if this was S5 of Sleepy Hollow (I don’t know if there will be, but I’m sure you see what I mean) and Abbie Mills had gotten a job offer in Washington and told Crane to go get someone else to annoy, I would be a 100% with it. Abbie was introduced as a character who wanted more. She was on her way to Quantico and out of Sleepy Hollow when this whole thing started and she decided to put what she actually wanted on hold to save the world and all.

But we’ve been told over and over that what Beckett cares about is speaking for the little guy. She wants to stand up for the victim and the people who cared about them. She wants to get justice and find the truth no matter how powerful the forces standing against her. The dude working for the attorney general, on the other hand, didn’t appear to do any of that. He seemed like just another government lackey out for blood who didn’t really care who got hurt along the way- and he didn’t seem to care much about the truth either. I mean, think about it- the killer turned out to be a angry teenager. If Castle had been right and this was a government conspiracy, do we actually believe for a second that that guy wouldn’t have been the first to step in and cover it up? Not only was it my impression that this was the read the writers wanted me as a viewer to take on this guy, I thought that was Beckett’s impression as well- and suddenly this is her big dream job?

So, my take away message from all this? It’s a plot-device and nothing more. I mean, the whole last few episodes of the season were stupid little scenarios meant to show Beckett and Castle that they don’t appreciate their relationship enough. She’s standing on a bomb and they don’t appreciate their relationship enough. Ioan Gruffudd’s still got it even though we had our doubts after The Fantastic Four and they don’t appreciate their relationship enough. She could go to Washington if he doesn’t do something and THEY DON’T APPRECIATE THEIR RELATIONSHIP ENOUGH!!!

Really, Castle? Really? This show has so many great characters that I thought they might- you know- want to be true to them once in a while.

(Also, while I’m pissed off, can I just say WTF is going on with this IT girl? I know that Los Angeles would fall into the sea if there was ever an unattractive woman in show business, and I know that there are pretty nerds in this world, but couldn’t they at least slap a pair of eyeglasses on her or something and pretend like they were trying? I could be hanging out with the wrong kind of nerds- and if so please do tell me where the other kind live so that I may go and marvel at their hotness from afar because God knows I’m not sexy enough to be in their number- but it’s my impression that they either aren’t very good looking, or they are but they spent so many of their formative years being told that they weren’t that they sort of stopped trying, and if Esposito was making bedroom eyes at them would be more likely to wince and avert their eyes than smirk.)

potentiality_26: (castle)
I'm having fun, insofar as that goes.

I wasn't wild about Castle and Beckett getting together, not because I dislike the pairing particularly but because they'd been playing the will they or won't they one step forward and two steps back game forever and shows that do that don't tend to go in for the whole actual functional relationship thing.  I'm talking about Wes/Fred of Angel (about which my heart is a little bit broken over to this day.  "Happy relationships don't make good television."  Sigh.  Sometimes I hate you, Joss) vs. Chuck/Sarah of Chuck (they fell in love, they angsted, they dated, they got engaged, they got married and they were happy and it was beautiful and there is nothing wrong with that).  Anyway, I'm maybe halfway through season 5 and I'm tentatively saying that they may prove me wrong.  Which brings me to...

Esposito and Lanie.  Why, God?  Why?  I mean, they don't really have any chemistry, their relationship would certainly have an effect on their work nearly as much as Castle and Beckett's would, and just- Why?  What purpose does pairing them together serve?  I don't object to Ryan and Jenny in the same way, because they're adorable- but that relationship wasn't really necessary either.

In the first season, one of the many things that I loved about Castle was that there was a het pairing in Castle/Beckett and a slash pairing in Esposito/Ryan that I could enjoy separate from one another, because I hate having to write off a canon relationship if I want to enjoy a slash one.  We knew nothing about Ryan and Espositio outside their work, which made them basically blank canvases as far as their love lives went.

Now, I don't expect popular slash pairings to become canon.  I don't even expect shows to introduce gay characters, though I really wish more shows would.  I just wish that every once and a while writers would be okay leaving that open so we can fill in the gaps in our own way.
 

Profile

potentiality_26: (Default)
potentiality_26

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 02:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios